Monday, July 25, 2011

What would we be today if today's government was in place in 1791

  As I was sitting at Starbucks ($2.25 iced tea) I read an article where Dow Chemical is going to build a $20 billion chemical complex in Saudi Arabia in partnership with Saudi Arabian Oil.

From the Kansas City Star:
The companies said Monday that work on the long-awaited Sadara Chemical Company venture will begin immediately. It should start operations by 2015.

The complex, located in Saudi Arabia's Jubail Industrial City, will include 26 manufacturing units producing chemical products and plastics for use in the energy, transportation, infrastructure and consumer products industries.

Dow and Saudi Aramco say it will be one of the world's largest integrated chemical facilities. It will cost $20 billion, including funding from export credit agencies and financial institutions.

Now, I wonder what our local Laredo frac-a-sterics would think about something like that being built here in Texas.  I would bet that they would be up in arms wanting to stop such an obvious Mother Earth mutilating enterprise.   Of course such a plant was probably never considered for construction anywhere in the United States because of the permitting and political process in building such a venture.  The $20 billion cost there would probably equate to $40 billion here due to our extra fees, lawsuits and other business stopping courses of action. 

These types of stories, and personal experiences in corporate America, lead me to my long standing belief that US companies fled the United States in the late 70’ s through today, not just because of wages, but because of environmental actions and the endless array of litigation that U.S. based companies must endure.

Here is a question for anyone.  Would the United State be where it is today if there were the same government agencies in place the day the United States Constitution was ratified (1791)?  Would we have embarked on westward expansion?   Would the industrial age in the United States have been allowed to happen?  Or, would the U.S. have taken a back seat to Europe or China?

I read this article this morning while doing some quick search on the current life expectancy of United States citizens.  It was an article written in 1993 titled, The Environment Since the Industrial Revolution, written by Harry Lee Smith[i].  It is relevant to the above story in that our environmental regulations are a big part of the flight of manufacturing plants and development firms from this country.  If you are hooked on a misanthropist desire to return to expensive power sources like windmills and the sun, then you should read this article and try to tell me how industrialization, advances in chemicals, and the free American spirit and economy have harmed us so badly we must attempt to ban or over regulate those things that allow us to enjoy our current lifestyles.

This final paragraph says it all for me.

 The extraordinary and unprecedented improvement in our quality of life during the past 200 years can be attributed to individual freedom, technology, industry, and economic growth. Let us not sacrifice the system that has given us longer life and better health to unwarranted fear of the very processes of that system.



[i] Mr. Smith is a free-lance writer in Atlanta. This is an edited version of a piece that originally appeared in the March-April 1991 issue of the Cato Policy Report, published by the Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20001.


Webb County Review Process

Am I the only one who finds the Webb County Court's process of reviewing department managers in an open forum?  I know this has been going on since I moved here in 1992, but isn't it kind of like watching a reality TV show? 

Maybe that's what the commissioner's want, more face time where they sit "above" everyone in judgement.  Kind of egotistical don't you think?

Of course, this is what we expect of elected officials from anywhere.

PS, it has nothing to do with open government.  If that was the case, ALL government employees would be reviewed this way.

Great Turnout at the Big White Elephant



Looks like a few thousand folks showed up at the Great White Elephant (the Laredo Energy Arena) for the Sister Cities Conference.

These crowds just keep growing.

PS, name a place in Laredo you could have had that many people in one place with more than adequate parking?

Keep up the good work Mr. Speaker


Isn't it amazing that the president is the one who is holding up the debt deal.  Say what you want, but it is the president's insistance on a deal that will last past the election.  Both houses agree that cannot be done.  So, it is the president who is holding things up.

PS, To all those who like to use the term "The Party of NO", how does that compare to the liberal support of those legislators who "flee" their states so they do not have to vote.  Should we label them "The Party of Cowards", or "The Party of Quitters"?

Saturday, July 23, 2011

YOU MUST READ THIS.....A FAMILY IN NEED


I am reprinting this from the Crittters and Crayons blog.   The C&C blogger has a heart as big as Texas, and I urge you to do what you can to help this family.

 

For Katie: The Angel With A Warrior Spirit

Kaitlin Mary was born on a Wednesday. She breathed and cried for the first time on July 13th, 2011 just after noon. Her mother carried her for thirty-eight weeks. She was born small, weighing just 4 pounds and an ounce and she stretched her legs to fifteen and a half inches. She is called “Katie” by her father and mother, her older sister, and the many, many other people who love her.
She was born an anencephalic baby.  She was born. But, she was expected to die. Doctors told her parents her newborn affliction was “incompatible with life”, a woefully clinical euphemism for what it really means. And, also woefully inaccurate. You will see that she is full of life.
During the months leading up to birth, most parents excitedly plan their newborn’s first photo shoot, what matching outfit will be worn home, or maybe what nursery decor will welcome their healthy baby.
Dawn and Michael made funeral arrangements. They selected a casket. They put the coroner’s number on speed dial. They ensured a priest was on stand-by so their daughter could be baptized. They explained to their five year old, that her baby sister will be born, but that she will go to Jesus quickly. They picked out a welcoming outfit. And then they picked one to bury her in.
Katie was sent home with her parents, barely weighing four pounds, about the size of a gatorade jug. The doctors let her go without much accompanying instruction despite her intense ailment and low birth weight because of the fatal prognosis. Her parents wanted her to ascend from home. They had the paperwork to fill out. They had their neighbor-Sheriff’s number to notify upon Katie’s passing. They had what they needed.
But, she lived. At this writing, Katie has celebrated nine birthdays, one for every 24 hours she keeps fighting.  Everyone hopes for more. But, they trust that God will take Katie when she is ready to go. She’s just not ready yet.
Anencephaly is a serious birth defect that has left her without parts of her brain or skull. It’s a neural tube defect (NTD) which means that it occured during the first month of pregnancy, probably before Dawn even knew she was pregnant. Katie’s neural tube didn’t close all the way. Most anencephalic babies are born without the front part of the brain (forebrain) and the thinking and coordinating part (cerebrum).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Image of An Anencephalic Child
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that each year, about 1 in every 4,859 babies in the United States will be born with anencephaly. Low intake of folic acid before getting pregnant and in early pregnancy increases the risk of neural tube defects like Katie’s. And, for reasons that are not well understood, hispanic women are at higher risk of having an anencephalic child.
Katie was born with a fleshy notch on top of her head, which is really part of her brain encasing.  Her parents dress it frequently and cover the protective bandage with a modified pink preemie cap to keep her head warm.  She was also born with a cleft palate.  This gives her difficulty in achieving a latch when eating from a bottle but it does nothing to quell her determination to do so.  She is a vigorous eater and she fights for milk the way she fights to breathe.  One of Katie’s eyelids failed to separate as well.  This lends further to the asymmetry of her face with a bump protruding where her left eye should be.  All of these facial anomalies might seem to form a disfigured baby to callous eyes.  But, the truth lies in the accepting vision of the small children who come to see her.  They see that she is small like a baby doll.  They see she is alive.  They see she is adored.  Anything unsightly perceived  beyond these three truths is an ugly distortion.  Katie is beautiful.
There isn’t a known cure or standard treatment for what ails her. Almost all babies born with anencephaly will die shortly after birth.
Except for Katie.
Katie behaves in a way that defies expectations. She was expected to die in the hospital within hours of delivery with little or no abilty to respond to stimuli. But she does more than exist. She responds.
Katie yawns…

And she clutches…..

And she smiles…..

It may seem unlikely that her smile is authentic. Even healthy babies aren’t supposed to be able to do that yet. But, if you have seen her, you know that she does. When Dawn bends down and kisses her tiny face, Katie’s mouth opens and upturns in what can only be the genuine smile of a baby in love with her mother.
Michael and Dawn expected to give birth to a blind baby. Developmental books inform that healthy newborns have poor eyesight but that they can see their mother’s face from the breast. When Dawn cradles her baby close, and nuzzles her little nose, Katie opens a healthy, blue eye and she sees her mother. Watches her. Searches her. Some might think it unlikely that she can respond. But, this baby is a testament to unlikelihood. She is a miracle.
There have been many people close to the family who have reached out. A legion of women has been bringing meals to them for weeks and will continue until their vigil ends, and beyond. In April, local crafters who heard about the family’s impending struggle auctioned their wares to benefit the family and offset medical and funeral expenses. Later that month, a large group walked in honor of Katie for The March Of Dimes- March For Babies. A photographer volunteered to capture professional images of the family to help preserve these sacred seconds. And, a group of women rallied behind the family and formed Katie’s Fighters.
Led by pillars and dear friends to Dawn:  Amy H., Danielle and Amy G., the group runs the Katie’s Fighters Facebook Page. It’s a page that is only as old as Katie and already has over 300 fans. Katie’s Fighters wants to spread the word about anencephaly, the need for more research and to help the family chronicle Katie’s struggle with photos, updates and prayer. The group has formed a support net around the family and is ready to catch them if they falter, become weak or need help. Amy H. is the central point for anything that needs to be coordinated outside of Katie’s immediate care. She, with the help of a few loyal friends, manage the website and protect the family from having to do anything other than just be with Katie.
The friends and extended family who have come to help Michael, Dawn, Lina and Katie are truly amazing. But, there are not words to describe the strength, love and resolute faith of this family.

Michael and Dawn take turns sleeping every day that Katie is with them. There is brief family time where all four are up in the morning to eat breakfast, but then it is time for one parent to sleep. One must be awake and holding Katie when she faces her most difficult battle.

The family is grounded in deep faith that this experience, tragic as it appears from the outside, is still a blessing. They believe this trial, crippling for most, is something they can handle. They are firmly rooted in their trust that God would not give them an insurmountable challenge. He has given them a sad and immeasurably painful one. But they are determined to survive the unsurviveable through faith.
Dawn says her faith in God has not suffered. Rather, it has been strengthened. She never expected to have this precious time with her daughter. But, she does and she thanks God for that, too. She also says that Katie has been an inspiration for many people to renew and revive their waning faith. This tiniest of newborns has given families pause to consider their priorities in life and where their children fit in. She has made families closer and a community tighter. In just nine short days, Katie’s life has already been filled with meaning and purpose, qualities that an unfortunate many fail to achieve despite whole bodies and long, unfulfilled lifetimes.

Their daughter, Lina (short for Angelina) is one of the most remarkable girls you could ever hope to meet. She exudes a maturity beyond her years and an understanding and acceptance that she has gained far too soon. When small children see her sister, and ask about Katie’s “little boo boos”, Lina is honest and direct. “No, she has big boo boos.” And, she holds her sister’s miniature hand and kisses her with compassion and love. She is strong. She is like her parents. She is like her sister.
Many people may find it hard to imagine the resilience that this family has shown. No parent should have to bury a child and few could face such a task with the same dignity and calm. But, Dawn has a sage perspective that is simple and profound. It all makes sense because of one tiny blanket.
Dawn made a pink satin blanket to swaddle her daughter. It’s soft underside is green and patterned with ladybugs. She made it with the intention of burying her daughter in it. She never imagined that this blanket would swaddle her warm, breathing, smiling, watching, grasping, fighting, beautiful baby girl for more than minutes or hours.
When Katie’s hardest battle is over, her warrior spirit and small body will be comforted and warmed for eternity in a blanket her mother made for her, that is now filled with the full energy of unexpected memories, undeterred faith, intense gratitude, the ripples of her movement, and transcendant love.
It is a sad story but with happy parts if we can only look for them by following Michael, Dawn and little Lina’s example. When the rest of us feel weak from fear, sadness and overwhelming empathy, and when we look at our own children and we weep for joy that they are whole and safe and here, we can find solace, ourselves, in that pink and green satin blanket.
It is the tiny blanket made with love, through the tears of a mother mourning her daughter before she was born, but who who felt her cherished heartbeat for so many unpromised days, that will embrace and comfort us all.
***************************************************************
If you are interested in helping Katie’s Family through donations, services, or fund-raisers, please contact Katie’s Fighters
Via email at:  amyskye99@yahoo.com
Or via Facebook at:
You can learn more about Anencephaly at the following link:
Current Fund Raisers:

Monday, July 18, 2011

Weekly Tidbits


Here are some local faces I found at Jarvis Plaza.....

·         Tomorrow, July 19, 1953, a date that will live in history, is the day I was born.  No gifts please, unless you know me, and know where I hang out.  In that case, cash is fine.

·         A "Hispanic" Tea Party Chapter in the valley.    FINALLY.  The Tea Party is not about race, political party, anything other than those who believe in the US Constitution and limited government.

·         Too bad for US Women's soccer team.  Good for Japan, they needed the good news.

·         Your task this week, check out all the other local bloggers sites.  Please comment on them as that helps them understand how many people are reading.

·         Republicans, hold the line.  Do not budge on tax rate increases.  Get the cuts in writing.

·         Question of the week:  Why is it important to know the ethnic make up of the United States?  Why do we need to know there are 45 million Hispanics, or 37 million African Americans, or 13 million Asians composing the 300 million Americans?  Why is that breakdown important to anyone?

·         If money is the measure of whether a child will receive a “good” education, why are the Catholic schools able to turn out better students for less cost?

  • Sounds like Gov. Perry will be a U.S. presidential candidate in about 3 weeks.  GOOD.

Al Gore and Reality....not three words you normally see occuring in the same sentence

You gotta love Big Al vs. Big Oil and Big Coal.  By the way, who is funding ol' Big Al?

Sunday, July 17, 2011

I can't say it any better than "The Dailey Bayonet"

Here is an article from the Hippie bashing Dailey Bayonet.   Be sure to read about the enviro gang originally liking shale gas until they realized it would hurt their pet projects.

Gas Up
Last week we featured a video with Ethan Hawke and other pretty people pushing the anti-fracking narrative.
Greens are terrified that shale gas will prove so popular it will end their inefficient pipe-dream renewables programs.  See what this gas industry analysis says, and you can see why Big Green is so desperate to find something, anything it can use to make shale gas a demon:

“You have one energy that represents today more than 20 percent of the energy mix, and solar today is close to zero and will represent maybe 1 or 1.5 percent in 20 years from now,” said Jean-Jacques Mosconi, Total head of strategy.  The trouble is that a new “golden age of gas,” as the International Energy Agency dubbed it, has created massive over-capacity in a key rival fuel for power generation. 
“The economic viability of a lot of the renewables are getting killed because we have too much gas in the world right now,” said Jeff Currie, global head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs.  “It’s made a lot of these other projects like solar and wind struggle in terms of their economic viability, and coal too.”

Gas power plants can be built at a fraction of the cost of nuclear, and the reserves found so far are eye-poppingly huge.  The US alone is estimated to have 862 trillion cubic feet of the stuff.  Turn up the thermostat and call me Lucy, that’s a lot of gas
.
Another benefit of shale gas is that it doesn’t require toxic materials like solar panels, and it doesn’t shred birds or drive people nuts from noise.  With modern scrubbing technology, it’s a pretty clean burning fossil fuel option.

In fact, it’s such a good fuel that greens used to like the idea of shale gas:
Given its greenhouse gas benefits, environmental activists initially welcomed shale gas. For example, in August 2009 prominent liberals Timothy Wirth and John Podesta, writing on behalf of the Energy Future Coalition, hailed shale gas as “a bridge fuel to a 21st-century energy economy that relies on efficiency, renewable sources, and low-carbon fossil fuels such as natural gas.”

The same year, environmentalist Robert Kennedy, Jr., head of the Waterkeeper Alliance, declared in the Financial Times, “In the short term, natural gas is an obvious bridge fuel to the ‘new’ energy economy.”

That sound you hear is hippie teeth grinding. If they’d thought it through (heh), they would have seen that it represented a threat to their favorite energy placebos and never supported it.  But they did, and the internet never forgets.

So far, the ‘best’ weapon hippies have against shale gas is the misinformation that fracking somehow affects water.  It’s a straight-up fabrication that even EPA director Lisa Jackson can’t support.
Shale gas will inevitably end the current fad of subsidizing inefficient renewables for the simple reason that businesses and consumers will punish any politician that keeps raising energy prices when an affordable alternative exists. 

Transformation to shale gas will happen, but it will happen against a background of howling screams from the green left who want anything but affordable, abundant energy.

More on Frac-A-Steria

To my Frac-a-sterical friends.  On the Safe Fracking Coalition FB page, they put up a Bloomberg article on study conducted by the City of Fort Worth, Tx.  Read their article and you will see that at 5 out of 388 wells there was concern about air quality.  But read this article and you get a different picture.  Note the bean serving protesters in the middle of the article.  Priceless.

By:  WFAA
Posted on July 14, 2011 at 10:03 PM
Updated Friday, Jul 15 at 9:07 AM

FORT WORTH - Fort Worth residents finally have some answers about possible pollution from drilling in the Barnett Shale. 
No other city has so many gas wells so close to so many people.

Fort Worth spent about $1 million in badly needed gas well revenue to measure emissions from all the drilling and processing. The long awaited study by the Eastern Research Group did not reveal any "significant health threats." It also concluded the city's 600-foot setback for wells is adequate.

Fort Worth's new mayor, Betsy Price, said the report's conclusions brought a sense of relief. 

"We've all been sitting on pins and needles waiting to see," she said. "I hope it makes people feel better." 
She called the report the most comprehensive study of its kind, and said it should relieve fears about pollution from gas drilling.

Maybe it will for some, but fear and suspicion remain. Outside Arlington City Hall Thursday night, a group worried about drilling industry pollution donned Gov. Rick Perry face masks and served up beans. They were illustrating their claim that the state is sacrificing their health to big business.
"Air quality now is worse than it was last summer," said Jim Schermbeck, of Downwinders at Risk. "We're not making any progress."
Schermbeck and others came to address members of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, begging them to put tighter restrictions on gas well emissions.
"If you can't figure this out, step aside and let the EPA protect us," one mother told the TCEQ.

They pointed out that the Fort Worth study on air quality did find that drilling activity pumps an additional 20,000 tons of emissions into the air each year. The study found that five sites exceeded regulatory thresholds, but that almost all the pollutants have low toxicity, with the exception of small amounts of benzene and other toxins.

"Is it perfect? Certainly not," Price said. "We haven't had a chance to go over it in depth yet, but at first blush, it looks good."
The Eastern Research Group will formally present its findings to the Air Quality Committee at 3 p.m. July 18 in the pre-council chambers at Fort Worth City Hall.

Frac-A-Phobes show elevated symptoms that lead to Frac-A-Steria

Frac-A-Phobia is only a symptom of Frac-A-Steria (Hysteria, get it).  Looks like the Safe Fracking Coalition’s moderate case of Frac-A-Phobia has elevated to the most serious Frac-A-Steria.  Checking out their Facebook page, you can see that now the oil and gas industry are brainwashers, negligent, arrogant, slimey, and dirty. 



Local blogger, LaredoTejas, calls them brainwashers because a company had a coloring book to illustrate fracing.  Kind of like the Global Warming/Climate Change/Misanthropologist coloring books showing that man is killing the planet. 

And it looks like the coalition supports the comments of Mark Ruffalo who said "This is an industry that is the dirtiest, slimiest, most arrogant, and negligent that you can imagine."   Ruffalo made this comment on Al Gore’s Comment TV Network, on the Keith Olberman shown.  You remember Kieth, the guy who was fired from MSNBC.  Pretty hard for a liberal to get fired from MSNBC, but he did.  So now he is on the Nobel prize winning Al “The World is Burning Up” Gore network.

Yep, my friends, those folks at the Safe Fracking Coalition are really looking out for your interest by only seeking the truth about the fracing process.  Experts on fracing: a movie star and a fired TV host =  Priceless.

Again, to the Safe Fracking Coalition:  Tell us what you really want to happen.  Answer these questions:

A.       Do you want the fracing process to end nationwide?
             1.  Or do you just want to regulate it to death?
B.      Are you afraid the newfound shale gas/oil plays will produce enough cheap/reliable energy that the renewable energy fad may come to an end?
 
These are some of the questions you need to answer.  Because we now know you are way beyond wanting safe drinking water.

GE Profile™ 30" Free-Standing Gas Range with Baking Drawer — Model #: PGB918SEMSS  "Why do they hate natural gas?"

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Why I am not for tax rate hikes on the rich. A respone to LaredoTejas's blog.

I love the fact that there are several bloggers in Laredo of varied opinions.  I think I am the most conservative of the group, and that is just fine with me.  Although, at some point some reinforcements might come in handy.

Anyway, here is a partial post from blogger Laredotejas.  He seems to want to make you believe that I am for cutting Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.  While I am not for entirely gutting these programs, they do deserve some refinement and upgrades, including possibly raising retirement ages, and fixing some of the fraud problems. 



Wade Watch: Tom Wade supports continued tax breaks for the Rich

 Whew, it was about time that Tom Wade spoke out about something. I hadn't had a chance for any new entries under "Wade Watch" but now that drought is over. In his re-launched website, "Wakeup Laredo", Wade, as expected, defends the continued tax breaks for the richest in the country. As do most republicans, Wade would much rather see cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security than to force the super-rich to just one Lear jet each.
Well, for one thing if Wade's a regular at Starbucks we can be sure he's not suffering financially. I guess that makes it that much easier to "stand up for the rich". The Tea Party and the republicans and generally have somehow hypnotized that standing up for the rich and against the poor equals "taking our country" back. It's a shame to see how robotic some of the ultra conservatives are. Day in, Day out, they repeat, over and over, whatever FoxNews or Rush wants them to say. Don't these people have any "real" principles as Wade proclaims. I wouldn't regard standing up for the more fortunate necessarily a "principle" so much as a way of trying to associate yourself with the rich.......even if it's as a lowly cheerleader.

This constant whine about class warfare is just that, whine.  We all know that higher earners pay a much higher percentage of the federal government revenue than those in lower income brackets, many of whom pay NO federal taxes.  It has been that way for a very long time.  The Tea Party and Republicans understand math, and can comprehend the idea of percentages.  Maybe we need some remedial math courses for some of the class warfare democrats.  You know, how to show that those that make the most money pay higher percentages of their income. 

Why do I defend those that want to keep the tax rates the same?  How about this little fact, we have not had tax revenues of more than 20% of GDP for any length of time since at least 1960.  This is true even though w have had much higher tax rates in earlier years, in fact, we once had a marginal rate of 91%.  Despite higher tax rates, tax revenues still tended to trend around the level of 18% of GDP.  There were short periods when revenues went up to 20% of GDP.  So, we can safely state that the long-term average for actual tax revenues is 18% to 20% of GDP. ( Again, percentages….hope I am not losing you)

This next line is one that really states what my argument is all about:  Higher tax rates can raise revenues to a point until taxpayers change their behavior and then revenues fall back to the long-term trend line.

What does that mean to all taxpayers?  People/business asks for, and then receives loophole tax subsidies from their favorite politician.   Don’t believe me, look at Wakeuplaredo.com’s new section and you will see where General Electric, a corporation that earned over $152 billion in 2010, and paid NO income tax.  NONE.  And to add to that: (from CNN Money website this little tidbit):  But there's still cause for optimism. GE's order backlog for core industrial products like turbines and locomotive engines stands at $175 billion, and could grow if plans for a $53 billion high-speed rail project ever win Congressional approval.     

GE’s corporate tax rate is 35%.  But they paid zero and could profit billions more if your tax dollars are spent on inefficient high speed rail projects that are being proposed.

So you see, no matter what the tax rate, people/business will find a way around them through loop holes and moving out of the country.  Which reminds me, ever wonder why so many companies left the US with their manufacturing jobs? 

Again, raising tax rates on big business and the ultra rich is a fool’s game.  It only causes more of a shift in actual tax pain to the middle class because the loop holes don’t apply to them.  Again, for those who don’t understand government workings, let me explain.

Government (all levels) base their budget on projected revenues and if those projected revenues are at X$, then the government will budget X$.  But when X$ is less than budgeted, the government’s (democrats for sure) first reaction is to RAISE the tax rate to raise revenue.  But it is a proven that the upper level of taxpayer and even some middle taxpayers change their habits or look for loop holes that allow them to pay less.  So as governments keep raising rates, they keep about the same revenue percentage stream and see only increased payments from those who cannot afford the loop hole finders.  So it becomes a never ending circle of increased rates without increasing actual revenue and that increase tax rate will still be paid by the small business owner and those that earn the big money will just find more loop holes and pay less taxes.  That is my point, and why I don’t want to see rates adjusted up, but down. How?

First, look at government spending.  It is growing beyond our incoming revenue.  Now, when we spend more than we take in, we get deficit spending.  That is what has been happening since the 1960’s.  Even with GDP increasing, the government just keeps spending beyond what they take in.  And when your government debt equals or exceeds your GDP, you are in real trouble, as we are today. 

So, the first way to fix our financial problem is not RAISING TAX RATES, but cutting our spending.  It makes no sense to raise taxes on those who can get around them via loop holes or just move out of the country and then have those that provide the most jobs pay higher rates because they cannot afford to move, or hire high dollar loop hole finders/creators.

What I would like to see, are you ready LaredoTejas, is the removal of ALL subsidies (tax loopholes) in the federal, state, and local tax system.  Of course you and I know that will never happen, as these are the real giveaways that politicians survive on.  It is not pork barrel spending, but tax loopholes that keep on giving.  And it is a problem in both parties.

Just think if we made everyone (and I would still accept a poverty line) pay taxes, everyone’s rate would go down dramatically.  There is no arguing this point.  It is a fact.  But, when you have entrenched politicians in place who want to pass out favors for re-election monies, what you get is lots and lots of tax loop holes.  But it is a political process of you do me a favor (loop hole) and I do you a favor (contribute to campaign).  Then of course there are the strong lobbies against the killing of loop holes.  Attorneys, accountants, and other loop hole finders would go out of business.  I say go out of business as did the oxen pulled cart.  But these folks have the money and connections to will be spent to assure them that the middle taxpayer keeps on paying more. 

This is why I am against class warfare, and why I am for the Tea Party.  They get it. 

PS, I will be at Starbucks tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. if you want to come by and share a cold glass of black iced tea.

Monday, July 11, 2011

Monday Tidbits

·         Frac-A-Phobe defined:  Frac-A-Phobes are those that want to do anything they can to kill the natural gas industry in an attempt to limit fossil fuels to everyone.  Frac-A-Phobes are by definition misanthropist.  They are those who want awards for supposed justice.  Those moms and dads locally that have concerns because of misleading movies like Gasland are not real Frac-A-Phobes. 

·         Some upcoming blogs I will be posting soon:

                   Using racism to bait your base.

                  What, the schools are still open and no teachers fired!

·         Looks like the local blogs are not touching the pro-fracing editorial in today’s Laredo Morning Times.

·         I miss BT Blues blogs and the photographs.

·         I should be at a baseball game tonight.  I was last year.  Can’t wait for the new ballpark and team.  PS,  every once in a while you can catch a game on TXN network.  That is the league our team will be part of.

Tax Hikes....NO WAY...Thank you Mr. Speaker

Thank you speaker Boehner for not allowing the Dems in DC force you into accepting any tax increases on next year’s budget.   The president and democratic leaders say the tax increases they propose are only for the “rich.”   Another lie from the left.    These proposed tax increases reach across all economic/class boundaries.
A friend of mine last week, at Starbucks, could not believe that I was standing up for the rich in the taxing debate.  He actually said: “How can you be for not raising the taxes on the rich.  You will never have that kind of money.”  I was dumbfounded by his statement.  Is there no such thing as standing up for principles?  I support women’s rights, even though I am not a woman.  I am strongly for equal rights among “all” people, no matter race, creed, religion, sexual orientation.  Yet, I am not a minority or gay.
The more I think about his statement, and he makes a lot more money than me, I am beginning to see what the next presidential election is going to be about. 
Here is the 2011 Democratic playbook:
a.        Race is an issue.  All republicans are racist because they want the US to enforce current immigration laws and they do not want wealth redistribution to continue on its current path.  They actually want to keep some of the money they earn.  PS here:  Republicans give more to charity than Democrats.  It has been documented and I believe it.
b.      Class is an issue.  Democrats will try to sell the story that the rich are richer and the working class is getting poorer.  There is some fact to the statement that wages have gone down.  The problem isn’t that the employers are paying out less money.  The problem is that employers are paying more and more money to governments and that is what is taking away from employees.
c.       We cannot pay our debt without raising taxes.  My friends, that is like saying, “I cannot pay my bills unless I get a raise.”  Of course you can still pay your bills, you just quit spending on non-essential items and budget your money better.  If we give the government more tax dollars, they will just spend it and not reduce the deficit.  Just look at history.
These three items alone will make up 90% of the 2012 campaign slogans and adds by the Democrats.  At least that is my bet.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Texting Ban Update

Here is where I want to say “I told you so.”  But I won’t.   WRONG.  I did tell you that there is not one shred of documented evidence that texting causes accidents in large enough numbers that would warrant a ban of the practice. 

 Again, I know that it is not the best practice to be texting while moving.  However, there was so much anecdotal crap being spread by people about this issue that I had to stand up and take the side of reality.

First, in Laredo, there is no correlation between traffic accidents and cell phone use, including texting.  In fact, I showed you earlier in the year that there is the same amount of traffic accidents in Laredo today as there was 10 years ago.  That is long before texting took off, and I put up the numbers to prove it.  (See; Texting and Driving – The Current Numbers Do Not Warrant a Ban Feb. 7, 2011 blog)

Again, I am not saying go out and text and drive.  When driving you need to be attentive at ALL times.  However, my point has always been, bans don’t work very well.  Education is still the best remedy.

PS:  Distracted driving is what you read below that is a major cause of accidents and fatalities.  You cannot stop distracted driving by bans.  It just cannot be done.  How do you ban not paying attention?  Enforce existing laws that every state has concerning inattentive (reckless) driving and you will go much farther in preventing accidents.

From the USA Today:
Safety group wants more data on cellphone bans
By Larry Copeland, USA TODAY
It's legal in 41 states for drivers to use handheld cellphones, and a leading highway safety organization recommends keeping it that way for now.
The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) urges states to hold off on banning the practice until more research is done to gauge the effectiveness of such laws.
"The problem is the research is conflicting on the issue," says Barbara Harsha, executive director of the group, which advises states on traffic safety. "We don't know if handheld bans are effective, and we don't know if they actually make the problem worse."
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said last year it found no reduction in crashes after handheld cellphones were banned in California, Connecticut, New York and Washington, D.C.
The National Safety Council says handheld bans don't go far enough. "We think there is enough research to enact total bans, handheld and hands-free," says David Teater, senior director of transportation initiatives at the NSC. "And there's no evidence that hands-free devices provide any safety impact."
At the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the federal agency that tracks road deaths, "we feel strongly there is robust evidence on the dangers of distracted driving," says Lynda Tran, NHTSA's director of communications.
The GHSA made its recommendation after reviewing research on distracted driving since 2000 — about 350 studies, Harsha says.
That review followed questions from governors and state legislators who are trying to navigate this still-unfolding aspect of road safety.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has made curbing distracted driving a signature issue.
Some corporations restrict the use of cellphones by employees while in company vehicles. And among some federal workers, the use of the devices while driving is limited.
The greatest momentum has come from lawmakers at the state level: Nine states and the District of Columbia ban handheld cellphones for all drivers.
Texting while driving is illegal in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Twelve states banned it in 2009, 11 did so last year, and two so far this year.
No states ban all cellphone use by all drivers.
According to the Department of Transportation, 5,474 people died and another 448,000 were hurt in crashes involving all forms of distracted driving in 2009.

Construction Has Started

Looks like our baseball park is finally under construction.  This would indicate that we seem to be on schedule for the season opener next spring.


Can't wait to hear the name of the new team and see the logo.  That should happen later this month.

Free Food Galore....Who's Paying for It, and Who Supports the Taxes

Are your tax dollars being wisely spent on Food Stamps and local food banks?  First off, I’ll bet you have no idea who the biggest supporter (lobbying group) is for food stamps and the like.  If you said the agricultural industry you would be right.  Our farmers, farm machine manufacturers and other groups associated with them are the ones who ask for increased funding for free food programs every year.

Yep, food stamp, and some food banks (some are not government sponsored) are nothing more than a subsidy to industry large and small.  

Ever wonder why there is never any real investigation into fraud in these programs?  Well, here you have a perfect mix of government agencies wanting to grow their power, and an industry that wants to grow it’s profits, all on the back of you the taxpayer.

You cannot tell me it is right for a person to leave the HEB with an overflowing grocery cart and get into a 2011 Escalade after paying the large portion of their grocery bill with food stamps.   It is wrong and fraud.   But in the land of give me something for nothing, and the land of the government knows best, this is what we get.

This is why Texas is having a contest for mayors to see who can increase their local food stamp rolls.  I would like to see a contest and prize go to a mayor who increases jobs in his city and reduces food stamp rolls.  How about that?

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

I'M BACK............................

After a month of  off-time, I am back.  No more radio show, so now I can concentrate on the blog. 

Please comment as you wish on any and all topics.  I will never edit a comment, only kill the comment if I deem it inappropriate.  And that does not mean I will kill those that I just disagree with.

So join in and participate in the conversation. 

PS, use the links to read other blogs.  They represent the heartbeat of Laredo.  Plus you deserve more than just the establishment news.

Tom

PS, check out three new post:
Shotgun Tidbits
Alexander Crossing
Frac-A-Phobia update

Shotgun Tidbits

Here are some of the hot topics going on right now, and my “short” take on each.

Casey Anthony Trial:
Not guilty.  State did not make it’s case.  Thank God for the United States Constitution.

Mexican National to be put to death in Texas:
I am not a fan of the death penalty for anyone.  And there is a case to be made about international                 law.

NBA and NFL lockouts:
Good, I like college sports just fine.

Texas Legislature:
A.       Overall good job. 
B.      Sanctuary Cities Bill:  Much more on this later, but do you remember our Laredo Police Chief stating that Laredo did not support the reporting of illegal immigrants to CBP because it would harm the relationship of illegals and the police department.  Well in the Laredo Morning Times, the LPD turned two illegals over to Border Patrol after traffic stops…..WAZUP CHIEF?

From LMT 762011:
Lots of tickets
Meanwhile, police officers
were kept busy with the holiday
celebration. Investigator
Joe E. Baeza, Laredo Police
Department spokesman, said
officers arrested eight drunk
drivers, gave out about 100 citations
for traffic violations
and turned over two people to
U.S Border Patrol agents.

So, how did the police know they were illegal?  Did they ask them about their immigration status heaven forbid?  So, politically it is wrong and racist for police to ask about immigration status, but OK in real practice as long it is not a Republican bill.  Is that how it works?   Help me understand this please.